© Copyright 2022 Ucavila
Menú
¡Atención!
Para participar en el foro de esta ponencia y recibir las notificaciones es obligatorio activarlo previamente para su usuario. Para ello, debe pinchar en el botón “suscríbase” un poco mas abajo. Podrá elegir si quiere recibir en su email todas las notificaciones o solo las respuestas a sus comentarios.
¡Disfrute del Congreso!
Congratulation for your work! It is a very interesting study. You mentionned the case of social network sites, where the users are obliged to transfer their data to use the social network site. So, even if the users restrict the amount of data to be comparted in their privacy settings, is data still used and transfered?
Dear Carmen,
Thank you very much for your interest. The question is not the personal data in itself (name, surname, etc.) but the data in a broad sense. Even if you remain anonymous, you create a non-real identity, the data will be that a person of a certain age entered the application at a certain time. This data will be processed and a profile will be created.
Dear William, first of all, congratulations on your presentation.
It is a very interesting topic and certainly very topical. It all stems from the debate on the use of personal data by large corporations.
Beyond the existing regulations, it indicates that there is a lack of precise regulatory parameters. In your opinion, what should these parameters be?
Again, congratulations.
Thank you in advance,
Sergio Náñez.
Dear Sergio,
thank you very much for your interest.
A change of perspective is needed. The “formal” law is not enough.
It is necessary to read the case from a value perspective. We need a balance of principles.
If I choose productivity I will have some parameters, if I choose man and his dignity I will have others.
If I choose man and dignity, an improper use of personal data could cause damage, for example to his image or reputation. If instead I choose productivity, even an improper use of a personal data will be allowed as long as it creates wealth.
The European system has chosen man and his dignity, for this reason, Data processing can be allowed as long as this work respects the dignity of man. Any commodification of man, even digital, should not be allowed.
In this way it is possible to create parameters commensurate with the concrete needs.
Ettore
Congratulations for your work. It has been very interesting. I would like to know your opinion about the laws related to the personal data. What do you think about the issue? Thank you again.
Best regards,
Juan Pedro Martínez
Dear Juan Pedro,
thank you very much for your question.
it is really almost unthinkable to “code” the internet. Each law can analyze one aspect but not all. The law is slow compared to the speed of the web.
For this reason every attempt is unsuccessful. If the theory of principles is used, it is possible to identify the discipline applicable to the entire legal system and not only to individual laws.
Ettore
Thank you very much for your explanation. It is very interesting.
Best regards
Congratulations for the work done.
I wanted to ask you the following question: Social network provider companies (Facebook, etc.) offer free services to users and they benefit from it. In this sense and leaving aside the conflicts that these networks have generated in recent years, how should the contribution that these companies make to the national GDP be estimated?
Thank you, professor
Dear David.,
thank you very much for your question.
It seems to me more an economic question than a legal one.
Undoubtedly, social networking companies produce wealth and therefore participate in GDP. But the point is how they participate. Wealth can be understood in different ways. You can have only economic and patrimonial wealth. You can have moral psychic wealth. What must be pursued is a wealth in function of the well-being of man. Well-being must be understood not only in an economic key but above all in a moral and ethical key. Category of being according to the category of having